The Buddha-nature controversy explained.
Sutta Nipāta Verse 503
A knowledge master, loving absorption, mindful,
who has reached awakening and is a refuge for many:
that is where a brahmin seeking merit
should bestow a timely offering as sacrifice.
Dhammapada 392
From whomsoever one might learnthe Dhamma of the Perfectly Awakened One,one should respectfully pay homage to that person,as a brahmin reveres the sacrificial fire.
1. Explained by figures.
Every single one of them has Buddha-nature. How can it be understandable? I have theories.
Hypothesis: As the Buddha is believed to once guide apprentices by showing a flower without words, people(or even animals) sometimes throw us hints to go awakenings speculatively unwittingly. But, some don't. Never. Is this the basis of the concept of the Buddha-nature we talking about?
Fig 1.1 Showing a flower and a smile: Buddha is believed to give his teachings not necessarily with words.
Fig 2.1 Single Point "No buddha-nature" theory
Fig 2.2 Threshold hypothesis
2. Sidenote
Recall: Something apparently misvalued ― it is an oppotunity.
Fig 3. A little tips for market chance make: Find the misvalued
コメント
コメントを投稿