The Buddha-nature controversy explained.

Sutta Nipāta Verse 503 

A knowledge master, loving absorption, mindful,
who has reached awakening and is a refuge for many:
that is where a brahmin seeking merit
should bestow a timely offering as sacrifice.

Dhammapada 392

From whomsoever one might learn
the Dhamma of the Perfectly Awakened One,
one should respectfully pay homage to that person,
as a brahmin reveres the sacrificial fire.

1. Explained by figures.

Every single one of them has Buddha-nature. How can it be understandable? I have theories.
Hypothesis: As the Buddha is believed to once guide apprentices by showing a flower without words, people(or even animals) sometimes throw us hints to go awakenings speculatively unwittingly. But, some don't. Never. Is this the basis of the concept of the Buddha-nature we talking about?
Fig 1.1 Showing a flower and a smile: Buddha is believed to give his teachings not necessarily with words.

Fig 2.1 Single Point "No buddha-nature" theory

Fig 2.2 Threshold hypothesis

2. Sidenote

Recall: Something apparently misvalued ― it is an oppotunity.
Fig 3. A little tips for market chance make: Find the misvalued

コメント

このブログの人気の投稿

Mahāyāna Buddhism "Emptiness" Explained.

Disease is emptiness―what made him ill? Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Chap. 4 (working)

Heart Sutra Mantra explained. (working draft.)